jackmack 334 posts msg #132770 - Ignore jackmack | 
11/24/2016 11:22:05 AM
  Kevin_in_GA
 I was thinking about the position sizing and what would help in keeping with the 5. 
 Then I started to think about the entry and exit signals. 
 Maybe this was covered already in the thread but I didn't see it so...  is the following feasible?
 If any of the long signals fire ultimately that would mean get long - and if the next signal to get long fires you would again get long. 
 Then you would hold no more than 5 long positions if you got the signal to do so from 5 different filters UNTIL a short signal fires then you exit your longs and go short 1 position in the same manner as above until you would have a max of 5 short positions then hold until  a long signal fires. 
 
 How would that perform?
 Much worse I suspect but until I get SS I don't have the means to see how it did in back testing. 
 
 I know the thought is moving away from your signals but if ANY one of them is signaling long or short ultimately it would mean just that - no?
 
 Thank you
 
  | 
jackmack 334 posts msg #132771 - Ignore jackmack | 
11/24/2016 12:00:58 PM
  Never mind
 That is a bad idea I just listed above
 
  | 
dtatu 143 posts msg #132773 - Ignore dtatu | 
11/24/2016 12:40:32 PM
  ... and Corr with GDX, which, I think, is more reasonable , than a 3x reverse splitted N times DUST, is:
 ^vix 10 day 	0.42
 ^vix 50 day      0.12
 ^vix 100 day    -0.41
 
 Indeed: only dust
 
  | 
nibor100 1,099 posts msg #132782 - Ignore nibor100 | 
11/25/2016 11:33:42 AM
  Using the past 6 months of ^VIX data downloaded from Yahoo Finance into Excel, I determined that if one went short each day, then 85.8% of the time there would be a profitable exit possible at an Open, within the next 10 days.
 
 If one went long each day then 82.5% of the time there would be profitable exit possible at an Open, over the following 10 days.
 
 However, if one went both long and short each day then just 68% of the time would both trades have a possible profitable exit within the next 10 days.
 
 Possibly shows how regularly volatile the ^VIX is when Open prices are used for entries and exits. 
 Ed S.
 
  
 
  | 
ferndave 65 posts msg #132904 - Ignore ferndave | 
11/30/2016 9:19:15 AM
  I scripted a backtest on the signals from 3-31 to 11-16, using TVIX and XIV, bought or sold at 5 minutes after open, with $10k. 111% return. -13.3% drawdown. Sharpe of 2.83. Ordering at 30 minutes after open dropped the returns around 20%. 
 
 Buy signal triggered for 11/30.
 
  | 
shillllihs 6,101 posts msg #132921 - Ignore shillllihs | 
11/30/2016 1:48:00 PM
  Is this thing long short or what now? Knock knock.
 Looks like everyone made out great and moved to the Hamptons.
 
  | 
mahkoh 1,065 posts msg #132937 - Ignore mahkoh modified | 
11/30/2016 5:56:43 PM
  Currently 3 long VIX signals on my end. Those from 11/17 and 11/21 are slightly down and up resp.
 The last from 11/30 up some 6 %.
 
 I've done some digging on NUGT and DUST and their assumed decay rate. I figured if you had gone short  on both and rebalance every night at the close you could have made a small riskfree fortune?
 The result actually surprised me a bit.  A "pair trade" short of $ 5000 both sides from 1/1/2013 until 11/25/2016 (984 trading days) results in a total profit of $ 2962.85, or about $ 3 a day. If you take into account that rebalancing every night would take $ 2  a day ($ 1 a leg at IB's rate) you're left with 994.85. And that's not taking cost to borrow into account.
 
 Unless of course I messed up my excel formulas..
 
 
 
  | 
dtatu 143 posts msg #132938 - Ignore dtatu modified | 
11/30/2016 6:13:43 PM
  Re . ferndave post
 
 1.111% down to 20% for a 25 min delay in a buy/sell , using the same instruments? Anybody can explain it?
 
 2. Do you, guys, think it's a good idea to use a 2X for buys( TVIX) and a 1X for sells( XIV) ?
 
 3.what about backtesting  a 2X , wasting , vehicle, reverse splitted N times? 
     - if you buy 5 units, in the backtest, at , example 1000$, you risk immensely more % of your account, no? Can one apply this kind of data to forward-test the system, while controlling the money management side of it, too?
 
  | 
dtatu 143 posts msg #132939 - Ignore dtatu | 
11/30/2016 6:18:51 PM
  makhoh
 
 Re.Currently 3 long VIX signals on my end. Those from 11/17 and 11/21 are slightly down and up resp. 
 The last from 11/30 up some 6 %. 
 
 What instrument do you use to calculate the unrealized P&L ?
 
 
  | 
dtatu 143 posts msg #132941 - Ignore dtatu modified | 
11/30/2016 7:04:23 PM
  ...well, I suppose is ^VIX, which is NOT a tradable vehicle.
 I think , we are trying to find the best instrument to mirror a ^VIX system ? 
 Reporting that ^VIX is almost unchanged sine Nov 17 does not help too much, as , in the Real world,
 VXX is down 7% and TVIX is down 14%.
 My FUTURE spread 1-2 is down 25%, for example.
 Just saying : let's talk real world, no?We all know that the Virtual system works: let's see if it also works on the Planet Earth?
 
  |