RGRAFF4098
6 posts
msg #34248
- Ignore RGRAFF4098 |
12/7/2004 7:32:46 AM
this phrase produces no results...any idea why? Thanks a lot!
|
james549
53 posts
msg #34258
- Ignore james549 |
12/7/2004 8:36:29 PM
Does this help?
|
RGRAFF4098
6 posts
msg #34266
- Ignore RGRAFF4098 |
12/8/2004 6:59:17 AM
James,
Thank you for your reply. My question was really trying to get at the root of why the syntax was incorrect. Everything I have read in the user manual and yepher's command guide indicates that this should be a valid phrase...
|
yepher
359 posts
msg #34268
- Ignore yepher |
12/8/2004 3:25:46 PM
RGRAFF4098,
Sorry, I don't have exact answers why it does not work but I have observed a similar behavior when using "0" value and the "approaching" clause. Here is how I have solved the problem in the past:
Or
if you do not like the "set" syntax. you could also try:
"0" seems to be handled special by SF and sometimes causes strange things to happen !?!
|
RGRAFF4098
6 posts
msg #34357
- Ignore RGRAFF4098 |
12/13/2004 6:35:16 PM
yepher
Neither of these is working...I'm getting results, but histogram is decreasing in only about 50% of the resulting list...
|