yaotiande
32 posts
msg #47564
- Ignore yaotiande |
10/20/2006 5:01:57 PM
what you trying to accomplish ? nikoschopen ?
|
nikoschopen
2,824 posts
msg #47565
- Ignore nikoschopen |
10/20/2006 5:15:59 PM
What's the real purpose of this thread? You and I both know that neither of us will ever trade solely on the conclusion of a one liner. Well, if you must insist on having one, here's one that will plausibly take you to the bitter end of fairy mother's dream-come-true vacation hotspot:
The date offset will reveal how well or poorly the damn thing fared over the prior 20 days.
|
marine2
963 posts
msg #47597
- Ignore marine2 |
10/23/2006 3:31:55 PM
Keep this nice lil filter in a more positive mode do this:
cmf(55) crossed above 0
and day change % is above 0
and price is above 4 and price is below 60
Backtested it showed a 61% wins vs 38% losses, not bad huh?
|
rharmelink
81 posts
msg #47598
- Ignore rharmelink |
10/23/2006 5:01:37 PM
My backtest (using 2004 and 2005) of:
cmf(55) crossed above 0
and day change % is above 0
and price is above 4 and price is below 60
...showed about a 50-50 split of wins and losses with a negative ROI.
|
marine2
963 posts
msg #47601
- Ignore marine2 |
10/23/2006 7:29:41 PM
I didn't go that far back as far backtesting. My backtest is of the limited version. I am sure you have even better ideas to enhance what this filter is trying to achieve.
|